Technical quality: precision where the photograph needs it
Technical quality has a default weight of 10%, with higher weights in genres such as macro, astrophotography and sports. Focus, grain and motion are judged by their effect on the image rather than by a demand for perfect pixels everywhere.
This is a category guide, not a checklist of mandatory rules. Genre, the selected critique level and your photographic intent shape the evaluation. The percentage above is the default weight; the weight used for a specific genre may differ.
What REVIEWR grades here
- Focus placement and clarity at the intended point of interest
- Noise, motion and processing relative to their visual effect
- Distracting artefacts, halos, fringing or detail loss when visible
What strong work looks like
- Clarity supports the intended subject
- Grain, softness or motion feels coherent with the treatment
- Processing preserves useful detail without distracting artefacts
What can weaken the image
- Missed focus that weakens the intended focal point
- Sharpening halos or aggressive processing that distracts
- Loss of important detail in areas that need to remain readable
A practice exercise
Inspect several original files at a useful viewing size and at 100%. Separate capture problems from processing problems. Test one supported correction on one image; do not assume a compressed upload proves what was recoverable in the original.
Check the change in a linked revision
Choose one issue from the critique and revise with that issue in mind. Use the improved-photo upload on the original critique; you can optionally explain what you changed. Compare both versions and their category feedback, then decide whether the change served the photograph. An unchanged score can still accompany a useful improvement.
Check your technical quality score
Submit a photo and see exactly where this category lands, with the written reasoning behind the number. Start with a free preview, no payment method required.
Get your free critiqueLast updated: 19 October 2026 · Written by Deni Dedic, photographer and founder of REVIEWR